Summary: Moosman et al. (2009)

Animal signals evolve in a variety of contexts. Some male fireflies (Coleoptera: Lampyridae) produce bioluminescent courtship signals during mate searching, and these males are often chemically defended. These courtship signals may have consequences (positive/negative) that are unrelated to mating. Moosman et al. (2009) examined whether Photinus flash signals are aposematic signals for insectivorous bats. They observed four species of North American bats in the field, then conducted behavioural and diet experiments in the laboratory to assess taste responses to the fireflies. Interestingly, fireflies were not found in bat faeces, even though they co-occurred in the field. Bats found the taste of meal worms coated with homogenized fireflies aversive, but responded differentially to moving lures based on a combination of lure size and flash cues. Moosman et al. (2009) suggest that flash signals of Photinus fireflies probably act as aposematic warnings to the common bat Eptesicus fuscus. This indicates that bioluminescent courtship signalling in fireflies may operate under competing selective pressures.

Summary: Paulisson (2008)

After long periods of training, lizards and snakes show spatial learning (an animal's ability to learn the location of resources for access in the future). It has been suggested that the natural environment is more conducive to spatial learning in squamates than the laboratory, as the animals become familiar with vital resources and landmarks within their home ranges. Paulisson (2008) hypothesised that spatial learning in little brown skinks (Scincella lateralis) can be improved with prior experience of a habitat. He subjected individual lizards to simulated predatory attacks and tested their ability a) to choose between 1 of 2 cardboard retreats (Experiment 1); 2) to choose a designated "correct" retreat without prior experience (Experiment 2); and 3) to choose the "correct" retreat after 48 hours of prior experience in the habitat (Experience 3). Paulisson (2008) found that little brown skinks learn to take refuge (Experiment 1), and experience leads them to choose the "correct" retreat in a short period of time (Experiment 3). He discusses the role of experience and the use of ecologically relevant landmarks in laboratory-based learning experiments.

Summary: Gerber et al. (2011)

Oceans are challenging areas for conservation, as large marine mammals move large distances, but are typically only protected in small areas. In 2006, the Papahānaumokuākea Marine National Monument (PMNM), one of the largest conservation areas in the world, was established with the primary aim of conserving marine wildlife. However, despite this goal, one of the endemic species of this area, the Hawaiian monk seal (Monachus schauinslandi) is declining as a result of high juvenile mortality. In contrast, populations outside of the protected area are increasing. The ecological drivers of the decline are currently unknown. Gerber et al. (2011) evaluated an intervention proposal by the Pacific Island Fisheries Science Centre. The benefits proposed included maintainance of subpopualtions in the Northwestern Hawaiian Islands through preservation of metapopulation structure. Gerber et al. (2011) indicate that this would provide more time for studies on the factors driving the population decline. They suggest that the inability of the PMNM to conserve monk seals reflects the differing ideals of conservation agendas, the necessity for understanding ecosystem and large-scale ecosystem interactions, and the necessity of adaptive management.

Summary: Kunc et al. (2006)

It is thought that overlapping of song in birds is a signal of immediate aggression. However, some evidence suggests that song overlapping may provide information to females about a male's quality, allowing them to make extrapair mating decisions based on male vocal performance (eavesdropping). Kunc et al. (2006) investigated how male behaviour (overlapping versus non-overlapping) influenced subsequent pairing status and how males respond to playbacks of vocalizations, using specific structural song components. They predicted that more successful males would overlap songs more if song is a signal of male quality. They found that males that mated during the breeding season overlapped their songs more to the playback than males that remained unpaired, suggesting that overlapping is a signal of male status. They also found that males adjusted the use of specific song components and decreased song rate, suggesting that flexibility of structural song components is more important than increasing song output. Since song overlapping may be a signal of aggression, Kunc et al. (2006) suggested that more aggressive males may have greater pairing success.

Summary: Sober & Brainard (2009)

Humans use vocal imitation from auditory feedback when learning to talk. Similarly, during the process of imprinting, young birds learn to imitate the songs of adults (tutors) through a reliance on auditory feedback. Initially discordant vocalizations are crystallized into mature song similar to their demonstrator's. During adulthood, humans continue to rely on auditory feedback to correct vocal errors. However, it is unclear whether parallel processes drive the stability of adult vocal behaviour. Sober & Brainard (2009) tested the hypothesis that adult Bengalese finches maintain vocal output by disturbing the pitch (fundamental frequency) of auditory feedback (using custom-designed headphones) and monitoring any resulting vocalization modifications. They predicted that shifts in auditory feedback pitch would cause birds to change their own song pitch in the direction opposite to the imposed feedback. They found that birds use auditory feedback and maintain their song vocalizations through a continual process of error correction. The birds adjusted their song pitch, thereby compensating for the auditory error imposed. Sober & Brainard's (2009) result show that error correction, even in adulthood, is a general principle of learned vocal behaviour.

Summary: Cardoso & Atwell 2011

Some oscines (songbirds) shift to singing at higher frequencies in urban areas (high noise-polluted areas), which has been interpreted as an adjustment to reduce acoustic masking by low-frequency man-made noise. Furthermore, they may also sing louder (i.e. higher amplitude) when exposed to noise and frequency shifting is thought to be less efficient than merely singing louder. Increasing vocalization amplitude in response to background noise is known as the Lombard effect. It has been suggested that high frequency singing might be a physiological consequence of louder singing, rather than just a a functional adjustment to noise. Cardoso & Atwell 2011 tested whether louder oscine songs are sung at higher frequency (central tenet of the hypothesis) using the dark-eyed junco, Junco hyemalis thurberi. The frequency bandwidth of songs and syllables increased with amplitude, involving lower minimum frequency in louder songs and syllables. Therefore, louder singing does not explain the higher minimum frequency of urban dark-eyed juncos. Amplitude and peak frequency were weakly positively related across but not within songs, suggesting that increased frequency is not an obligatory outcome of singing louder. Instead, birds may adjust both amplitude and frequency in response to changing noise or motivation across songs. Their results suggest that adjustments in song frequency and amplitude are largely independent and thus can be complementary rather than alternative vocal adjustments to noise. They discuss oscine vocal physiology and details of the behaviour of urban birds, both of which we argue are consistent with the increased frequency of urban birdsong generally being a functional adjustment to noise, rather than a consequence of singing louder.

Summary: Choi & Bowles (2007)

As in paper:
"Altruism—benefiting fellow group members at a cost to oneself—and parochialism—hostility toward individuals not of one’s own ethnic, racial, or other group—are common human behaviors. The intersection of the two—which we term “parochial altruism”—is puzzling from an evolutionary perspective because altruistic or parochial behavior reduces one’s payoffs by comparison to what one would gain by eschewing these behaviors. But parochial altruism could have evolved if parochialism promoted intergroup hostilities and the combination of altruism and parochialism contributed to success in these conflicts. Our game-theoretic analysis and agent-based simulations show that under conditions likely to have been experienced by late Pleistocene and early Holocene humans, neither parochialism nor altruism would have been viable singly, but by promoting group conflict, they could have evolved jointly."